Source: International Crisis GroupMadagascar is on edge as this report goes to press. On 17 November 2010, a group of military officers announced a coup, stating they had set up a “military council for the welfare of the people”. The authorities claim they have the situation under control and that the plotters aimed only to disturb the constitutional referendum taking place that same day. The regime also expresses confidence that the “yes” vote on its proposed new constitution will win handily, though there are already assertions of irregularities. Behind the scenes, some insiders express greater concern about the situation. What can be said with certainty is only that these developments demonstrate the fragility of the long-running Malagasy crisis and the urgent need, as described below, to adopt a new approach to end it.
Madagascar is sinking further into a major political crisis. International and national mediation attempts failed again in 2010, while the population becomes poorer and the state’s structures crumble. The High Authority of the Transition (HAT) has initiated a unilateral process to escape the crisis that is unrecognised by the opposition and the international community – both of which still contest the regime’s legitimacy. Actors who might have helped unlock the stalemate have been unable or unwilling to do so, and some have deliberately dragged out the situation to their advantage. It is time to stop mediation attempts and concentrate on supporting credible elections on the basis of strict conditions.
Since the beginning of the year and the end of the joint international mediation, the effort to resolve the crisis has stalled in a political standoff. The regime’s handling of power is contested, and corruption is soaring. The president of the HAT, Andry Rajoelina, mixes public and private interests in the manner that he forcefully denounced when the former president, Marc Ravalomanana, was in power. The absence of rules and authority that characterises the regime aggravates such practices.
The support of many opportunistic political parties creates a misleading impression of inclusiveness about the transition process the authorities have put in place. However, the regime is in control of what is in fact a unilateral plan and is confident that adequate financial backing is available to support it.
This scenario presents grave risks. If the authorities persist with the unilateral organisation of elections in 2011, the international community will likely refuse to recognise the new regime, and the crisis could last for several years. That would be a disaster for the country and the population. Madagascar is in a precarious equilibrium with a severe risk of social explosion and cannot afford to be isolated internationally.
Mediation attempts aimed at an inclusive transition have failed because of a refusal to compromise, and the time for them is over. The priority now is to get out of the crisis and only then initiate much needed reforms. The objective for the coming months, therefore, must be to organise credible elections with international assistance. That is the only way to restore constitutional order and revive the economy.
The three opposition political groupings (mouvances) representing the former presidents are increasingly marginalised, and it is now clear that the regime will not back down from its transition plan – which the constitutional referendum is intended to legitimate. At the same time, the authorities claim they want credible elections, not least to earn back international recognition. For that, they need to offer the opposition the necessary guarantees of a level electoral field and keep to them.
Madagascar’s political actors and the international community should consequently adopt the following approach:
- The priority must be for the Southern African Development Community (SADC), backed by the International Contact Group, and the de facto authorities to reach agreement that international support will be forthcoming for the electoral process but only provided that the regime fulfills several commitments. These should include Rajoelina’s confirmation that neither he nor his ministers will stand in the elections; revision of the electoral timeline; transparency on contracts; the government not exceeding its caretaker mandate; promulgation of the amnesty law; and an audit of state finances by international financial institutions. If the commitments are violated, targeted sanctions should be reinforced, with the European Union, U.S. and others – acting through the UN Security Council if possible – implementing the African Union’s measures (such as visa bans and the freeze of assets in foreign banks).
- Credible elections, free of regime control, should be held as soon as possible. The Independent National Electoral Commission (CENI) should be fully in charge and given the capacity and resources to organise them. It should, however, be reconstituted to make it acceptable to all parties, especially opposition parties, which should take up their seats on the CENI.
- The UN Secretariat should quickly send an electoral assessment mission to determine when credible polls can be held, and the timeline should be amended accordingly. Based on its assessment, the UN should then deploy a team of advisers to strengthen the CENI. This team should give robust support, especially on the revision of the voter registry, logistics, training of all involved in the process and civic education. Consideration should also be given to appointing international commissioners to the CENI to reinforce its credibility and neutrality. The UN should coordinate with other international organisations that can provide electoral help. International observers should also deploy early.
- The International Contact Group should meet as soon as possible, so that the international community can start acting in a coordinated manner. China, a member of the group, should align its economic position with its official political stance. The opening of SADC’s liaison office in Madagascar should be accelerated to monitor the process, and its special envoy should work closely with a UN political team.
Antananarivo/Nairobi/Brussels
