Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Dominican Republic: Managing Mental Illness on a Few Pesos a Month

Republished permission Inter Press Service (IPS ) copyright Inter Press Service (IPS)

http://www.ipsnewsasia.net/
and http://www.ipsnews.net/

Managing Mental Illness on a Few Pesos a Month

By Elizabeth Roebling

SANTO DOMINGO, Mar 22, 2011 (IPS) - Cristina, 41, was able to support the last two of her five children despite the fact that she could neither read nor write. Raised by a step-grandfather, she started working as a house cleaner when she was 14 and had the misfortune to have children by two alcoholic and abusive men.

Her third child, Juan, was diagnosed early on with a heart valve problem and mental retardation. At 15, he was only in first grade.

"The teacher just kept him in class as a favour to me, so that I could keep working. He was not learning anything. He cannot read or write," Cristina told IPS, asking that her last name not be used.

On the advice of a neighbour, Cristina started selling avocados three years ago, buying 100 fruits a day where she lived and taking them, in a washtub, on the four buses for her 45-minute commute to and from the capital, Santo Domingo.

She found a sidewalk space in an upscale neighbourhood. Despite the fact that her avocados cost 10 to 15 pesos (30 to 45 cents) more than the ones on sale in the supermarket, she usually managed to sell the bulk of them as she could easily pick out ones that were ripe for eating the same day and the day after.

She just managed to pay for her transport, food and rent. She was enrolled in the government Solidarity programme, which gives about one million of the poorest people in this country of 10 million a 700- peso (20-dollar) a month stipend for rice and beans and oil, and one free tank of cooking gas every two months valued at about 15 dollars per month.

But eight months ago, Juan started getting aggressive with the other children and the teacher sent him home, saying she could not keep him in class. He fought with his mother as well and would hit and bite her and throw things.

Cristina took him to the local public hospital near her home. There, a psychiatrist diagnosed Juan as having had a psychotic break and put him on several psychiatric medications, including haloperidol and carbamazepine. Calmed by the medications, Juan stayed with a neighbour while Cristina went to work.

The Dominican Republic has a system of subsidised pharmacies where the generic forms of most common drugs are offered for sale at discount prices. But psychiatric medicines are only available at designated hospitals. The hospital where Cristina took her son never had them available.

According to a report by the World Health Organisation, less than 20 percent of the state medical facilities have psychiatric medications available.

The report also noted that only three percent of medical education here concerned mental health, with only 12 percent of graduating doctors receiving more than two days of such education. There are just two psychiatrists for each 100,000 Dominicans. Of these, 68 percent work in the private sector.

For two months, Cristina could afford the generics. But then her son became dizzy and nauseous, and the doctor insisted that she had to buy the brand names. Those cost over 35 dollars a month, a price beyond her reach.

Cristina sold her stove and gas tank in order to buy the medicines. She took to cutting down trees near the one-room house that she rents and cooking with that outside the house. It is strictly illegal to cut trees without a permit.

In December, she sold her Solidarity card to a neighbour who gave her 175 dollars for it with the stipulation that he would keep it and use it for a year. This too, she knew, was illegal.

Despite the fact that an estimated 10 percent of the population is affected by mental illness, there is only one psychiatric hospital in the country. It receives half of the annual government budget for mental health - which is less than one percent of the total health budget of the country.

The hospital has been the subject of many articles in the press over the years, deploring its physical deterioration and the fact the patients are sometimes forcibly restrained and left in the nude.

Of the 125 patients, 58 have been abandoned by their families and have been there for up to 25 years. Every week, two or three new patients arrive. The majority stay for 10 days.

Cristina finally received help from one of her customers who called the director of mental health on her behalf. After explaining the situation to Angelina Sosa, a psychologist, she was told to bring Cristina and all the papers on the diagnosis and medications to their office.

"We have programmes to help you," said Dr. Jose Mieses, director of mental health, giving Cristina a month's supply of the needed drugs. "We will make sure that you get the medications. And we will introduce you to other mothers who have children like yours. There is help available for you in your business."

Asked why the local doctor had not told Cristina of these programmes, Sosa explained: "That doctor may have to see 25 patients a day. We are trying to empower the families of the mentally ill to band together. We have some local programmes for the care of the ill. But it is difficult for the local doctors to do everything.

"It is not our job here to see patients, we deal with policy and programmes," she added. "We took this only because it was a special case."

Sosa promised that she would investigate placing the boy in a care centre near his home, if a 15-year-old would be eligible for that centre.

The next day, Cristina returned alone to the office and was given a cheque for 2,000 pesos (54 dollars) for her business and assured that the medications would be available to her at no cost every month.

Compared to countless other poor and working families with a member suffering from mental illness, Cristina's case had a relatively happy outcome.

But she never did get any information on the promised aid programmes - no day centre, no training, no introduction to other mothers.

Aboriginal Issues: Australia - The next step is ours - again!

By: Luke Pearson - Guest Blogger

See also:
AboriginalOz


The next step is ours - again!


Aboriginal Australians across the country are being discussed by many non-Aboriginal people in terms of "Mutual Obligation, "Intervention", "Closing The Gap" and so on. Many Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people, in Australia and Internationally, from Elders academics, lawyers to activists and ordinary community members are using terms like "Discrimination", "Victim Blaming" and "Human Rights Violations".

There are countless calls to stop such practices, but there are also many calls from the wider community for Aboriginal people to "take responsibility' and as this year's NAIDOC theme proclaims: The Next Step Is Ours!

Many people will read that slogan as a positive reinforcement for an optimistic future...

For many others it reads as a slap in the face.

There are several reasons why.

Every step that has been taken so far has come through years of hard work, resilience and commitment of Aboriginal people and non-Aboriginal supporters fighting against the Government of the day. This is true of the Mabo Decision; The Wave Hill Walk Off, The 1967 Referendum; The Freedom Rides; The Apology and every other major (and symbolic) achievement for Aboriginal people.

The Government at best only ever takes the third step, after Aboriginal people and the wider Australian community have taken the first two.

I would like NAIDOCs 2011 theme a lot more more if it was "The Next Step Is Ours!... Again"

This is being seen again right now with the Lake Tyers Blockade. Aboriginal people not 'taking the next step', but instead repeating the immortal chant of the oppressed "We shall not be moved".

They, along with many other Australians, are saying "NO MORE! We are tired of not only taking EVERY step but also dragging the Government kicking and screaming along the way".

PM Paul Keating challenged non-Aboriginal Australians to take the First Step in 1992 in his famous 1992 Redfern Address: "However intractable the problems may seem, we cannot resign ourselves to failure... the starting point might be to recognise that the problem starts with us non-Aboriginal Australians.... Imagine if we had suffered the injustice and then were blamed for it. It seems to me that if we can imagine the injustice then we can imagine its opposite. And we can have justice."

This is a recognition that has been undertaken by many Australians and it is becoming less of a national debate and more of a logical reflection of the reality that Aboriginal people in Australia have not, and do not, receive 'A Fair Go'.

Yet, despite the Government's acknowledgement and apology for the past, it is continuing to engage in negligent and oppressive practices which are almost universally acknowledged by academics, Elders, community members and professionals as incapable of doing anything more than extend the existing Gap.

We do not need more governing rules, incentives and punishments.

We need to ensure that Government fulfil the responsibilities of being in Government.

We need effective partnerships.

We need to end the Intervention.

We need say over activities on traditional lands.

We need to eradicate trachoma.

We need economic opportunity.

We need to create sustainable jobs, schools, hospitals and housing.

We need to provide all Australians, Aboriginal or not, with the basic support and opportunity that is guaranteed under Australian laws and expected by 21st Century, 1st World community standards and expectations.

That we have Australian communities with no trash collection, no access to schools, housing, health care, police protection, transport or communication is a national disgrace.

At the moment Aboriginal life-expectancy is still below the retirement age. Effectively meaning that even those Aboriginal people who are lucky enough to find meaningful long-term employment, are unlikely to be able to enjoy their retirement for very long - if they even get to it.

This is not an issue of funding. We currently spend far more on employing non-Aboriginal people to research Aboriginal communities, manage their affairs and to incarcerate them, than it could ever possibly cost to create suitable infrastructure, service provision and economic opportunities for those same communities. Funding which would quickly see a return on its investment not only through increased independance and quality of life for Aboriginal people and the obvious and inevitable benefits to community life for all but also through less spending on gaols, police, research, unemployment etc.

Aboriginal activist Lilla Watson is often attributed with saying "If you are help to help me you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound up with mine, then let us work together."

At the moment few believe that the government is even there to help, let alone 'work together' with Aboriginal people.

There can be no reconcilitation without justice.

If the Government continues to ignore Australian demands for equitable treatment then we will continue to see more actions like the Lake Tyre Blockade and continued and increasing support locally, nationally and internationally.

Gandhi once said "First the ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win".

Aboriginal people have long been ignored, laughed at and fought by Australian Governments. It is now finally time for us to win.

I would like to acknowledge all those fighting in Lake Tyre, those fighting to End the NT Intervention and all those fighting for Justice in Australia - and offer my respect, my admiration and my support.

To the Government I would simply like to say: Don't worry about us taking the Next Step! We have been taking the necessary steps to survive for millenia and will continue to do so.

The author is a teacher, researcher, CA trainer, provocateur, social commentator and would-be author. Luke is currently working to complete his PhD on Aboriginal Identity Development & Education

India: Is Rahul Gandhi fit to lead India

By B.RAMAN
See also:
www.southasiaanalysis.org


Is Rahul Gandhi fit to lead India and enable it to take its rightful place as an Asian power on par with China?

2. It is very difficult to give a comprehensive answer to this question because there is very little known about him and the Congress (I) has seen to it that his personality and stature do not become the subject of public scrutiny. Without any scrutiny and without any enumeration of his positive and negative qualities and track record as a political personality, his followers in the party want to impose him on the country as the next Prime Minister in the unlikely eventuality of the Congress (I) returning to power in the next parliamentary elections whenever they are held.

3.I consciously called him a political personality and not a political leader because his ability to exercise leadership over the country has not so far been tested. Even in his own party, in which he has been holding office as the General Secretary for some time now, he has not set the Jamuna on fire. If one has to prepare a comprehensive CV on him for dissemination through the Internet similar to the CVs on political leaders circulated in the US and other democracies before elections, one will have difficulty in completing the task because there is so little known about him except the flattery disseminated by the members of his party.

4. When we are told by his party members that he is fit to be the next Prime Minister of India, we have a right to know on what basis they have come to that conclusion. Leadership does not necessarily require high educational qualifications.K.Kamaraj, the former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, who subsequently became the President of the Congress (I) and played a key role in post-Nehru transition, was hardly educated. And, yet, he turned out to be one of the successful leaders produced by India.

5. Let us, therefore, keep aside the question of Rahul Gandhi's educational qualifications which, in my view, are not important for this debate. My perceptions of Rahul Gandhi are marked by the following thoughts:

* A potential leader must have something more than good personal qualities. He must have an intellectual spark which does not necessarily come from his or her educational qualifications. Rahul Gandhi has not so far given evidence of such an intellectual spark.
* Till now, he has not demonstrated any leadership qualities by way of ideas and actions.
* His ability to understand and logically analyse the complex internal and external problems facing the country is yet to be proved.
* His views tend to be very simplistic and do not indicate wide reading and an ability to think deeply.
* A good leader of the future must excite the younger generation. Rahul doesn't---not even in his own party.

6.. Under such circumstances, the Congress (I) will be doing a tremendous diservice to itself and the country if its tries to have him imposed initially on the party and then on the country as the next Prime Minister of India. His track record till now---whether in respect of contribution to new ideas or new policies---has been mediocre. Apart from the fact that he has come from a highly privileged political family, which has made a tremendous contribition to the nation, he is yet to demonstrate any qualities which compel attention and could make us look upon him as a leader of the future.

7. It is important to have an objective and balanced debate on this subject devoid of rhetoric, abuses and ideological arguments so that we have a complete picture of him before our eyes on the basis of which we can decide whether he is fit to lead India in the difficult years to come.Congress (I) could contribute to this debate by opening a separate web site for him in which they could give all data about him relevant to this debate,

8. If the Congress (I) expects the people of this country to seriously consider him as a potential leader, he should not be treated as a sacred cow which has to be accepted by the people without any scrutiny. (23-3-11)
The writer is Additional Secretary (retd), Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently, Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai.

Nepal: Fires leave some 5,000 refugees homeless in camps in Nepal

Source: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)

Fire swept through two refugee camps in eastern Nepal on Tuesday, destroying some 700 shelters and leaving almost 5,000 people homeless. There were no serious casualties.

"Fire in two camps on the same day is a disaster," said Stephane Jaquemet, UNHCR's representative in Nepal, while adding that the refugee agency was working with the government and other partners to provide shelter and relief to those affected in the Goldhap and Sanischare camps.

An estimated 3,790 of the 4,355 refugees in Goldhap lost their homes and some 1,200 in Sanischare, which has a population of 12,590 refugees. The two camps house refugees originating from Bhutan.

This is not the first time that Goldhap has been ravaged by fire. In March 2008, fire razed 95 per cent of the camp and left most of its 9,770 refugees homeless. "The fire in Goldhap was as big as the one in 2008, engulfing the health centre, school and most other sections," said Jaquemet.

The fire spread rapidly through the closely packed huts, which are made of wood, bamboo and thatch. The cause of the fire is not clear, but an investigation has been opened. Hundreds of policemen and refugees fought the fires in both camps using fire trucks and hoses from nearby towns.

A government-led committee has been set up to coordinate immediate emergency assistance. UNHCR and its partners, including Caritas, Lutheran World Federation, the Association of Medical Doctors of Asia, the World Food Programme and the Nepal Red Cross, have started distributing food, blankets, cooking kits and tarpaulins for shelter.

Fire is a danger in the seven camps in eastern Nepal that house refugees originating from Bhutan, despite prevention and awareness campaigns conducted by the government, UNHCR and its NGO partners. The threat is particularly acute during the current dry season.

By Nini Gurung in Kathmandu, Nepal

India: At a time of great turmoil on the Asian strategic landscape, India is 'looking east'

Source: ISN

At a time of great turmoil on the Asian strategic landscape, India is 'looking east' – particularly to Japan – to enhance its regional relevance and offset China's growing prowess in the area.

By Harsh V Pant for ISN Insights

India's signing of comprehensive economic pacts with both Malaysia and Japan in the past few weeks is only the latest signal of how seriously the country is pursuing its 'Look East' policy. In a spate of recent regional engagements from Indonesia to Vietnam, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has made it clear that his government's foreign-policy priority will be East and Southeast Asia, regions poised for sustained growth in the 21st century.

The Look East policy, initiated in 1991 by Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao, has become the cornerstone of Indian engagement with the world's most economically dynamic region. After years of neglecting relations with its neighbors and being subject to Cold War constraints, the policy was designed to reinvigorate engagement with East Asia. Over the years, India has developed extensive economic and trade linkages with countries in the region, alongside a gradual strengthening of security ties.

Twenty years later, the Asian strategic landscape is in turmoil, with India still 'looking east' to enhance its regional relevance - particularly in an effort to offset China's growing regional prowess. The standoff between Japan and China over a boat collision last year underscored the Communist state's now more aggressive stance against its rivals, as well as against states considered allies of the US. Buoyed by its political and economic rise, Beijing has begun dictating the boundaries of acceptable behavior to its neighbors, laying bare the costs of great power politics. In response, the US and its allies have already started re-assessing their regional strategies, and a loose balancing coalition vis-à-vis China has started to emerge.

India looks to Japan…

The rise of China in the Asia-Pacific and beyond has fundamentally altered the strategic calculations of India and Japan, forcing them to rethink their attitudes toward each other. As a result, Tokyo and New Delhi have made an effort in recent years to push Indo-Japanese ties into high gear, with India's booming economy making it an attractive trading and business partner for economically stagnant Japan. Japan is also re-assessing its role as a security provider in the wider region - and of all its neighbors, India seems most willing to acknowledge Japan's centrality in shaping the evolving Asia-Pacific security architecture. Moreover, a new generation of political leaders in India and Japan are changing the trajectory of Indo-Japanese relations by not being beholden to previous governments' (negative) attitudes.

India's ties with Japan have come a long way since May 1998, when a chill set in after India's nuclear tests propelled Japan to impose sanctions and suspend its Overseas Development Assistance. Since then, however, the changing strategic milieu in the Asia-Pacific has brought the two countries together - so much so that the visit of the Indian prime minister to Japan last year produced the unfolding of a roadmap to transform a low-key relationship into a major strategic partnership.

An Indo-Japanese civilian nuclear pact would be a pivotal indicator that the two countries intend to build a partnership to bring stability to the region at a time when China has been going all out to reward Pakistan with civilian nuclear reactors, thereby putting the entire non-proliferation regime in jeopardy . But as Japan fights to contain a nuclear disaster, it looks increasingly unlikely that neither country will push for the deal in the near future. This in addition to the fact that Japan continues to insist that India sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). India has expressed no intention of doing so, given its long-held stance that the treaties are discriminatory toward the country.

…and beyond

In addition to Japan, India is also looking to enhance strategic and economic relations with other countries in the region. For example, trade was the focus of Prime Minister Singh's visit to Malaysia in November 2010. Having made a strong pitch for increased Malaysian investment in India, Singh and his Malaysian counterpart, Najib Razak, signed an array of agreements which galvanized bilateral economic cooperation and liberalized their respective foreign direct investment regimes . The security partnership between the two countries has been strengthened by the decisions to explore the possibility of collaboration in the defense sector, and to enhance cooperation in counterterrorism activities through information sharing, and the establishment of a Joint Working Group.

Indonesia remains another key player in India's Look East policy, and has played a key role in enhancing India's ties with ASEAN. By offering Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono the role of Chief Guest in India's Republic Day celebration in January 2011, India underlined the need for greater India-Indonesia cooperation in the years to come.

At the eighth ASEAN-India Summit in Hanoi last November, India made a strong case for its increasing relevance to the security and economic architectures of East Asia. India's 2010 Free Trade Agreement with ASEAN committed New Delhi to bringing down import tariffs on 80 percent of the commodities traded with ASEAN. This provides India with an opportunity to challenge China's growing penetration of East Asia, and helps prevent India's marginalization within the economically dynamic region. Having signed a free trade pact in goods, India and ASEAN are now engaged in talks to widen the agreement to include services and investments. India hopes to increase its $50 billion trade with ASEAN to $70 billion by 2012.

India is indeed pursuing an ambitious policy in East and Southeast Asia, joining forces with smaller states in the region in order to offset China's growing dominance, as well as to dampen the effects of America's likely retrenchment from the region in the near future. It remains to be seen, however, if India can live up to its full potential.


Dr Harsh V Pant teaches at King's College London in the Department of Defence Studies and is an Associate with the King's India Centre. His research is focused on Asian security issues. His recent books include Contemporary Debates in Indian Foreign and Security Policy (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008) and The China Syndrome (HarperCollins, 2010).

Bahrain: Bahrainis mourn woman killed at checkpoint

Mourners have gathered in Bahrain for the funeral of Bahiya Aradi, a woman who was shot and killed as she approached a military checkpoint last week.

The police and army moved in to end weeks of protests in the kingdom, which were inspired by a wave of uprisings across the Arab world.

Foreign Policy : Avoiding Panama and Colombia on Latin America Trip, Obama Maintains Unfocused Foreign Policy

Avoiding visits to key U.S. allies Panama and Colombia on his trip to Latin America which wraps up today, President Obama has made clear that the Administration has no intention of moving ahead with Free Trade Agreements with Panama and Colombia, weakening our position in the Hemisphere and letting dictators like Hugo Chavez push the envelope on regional security.

Chairman of the Western Hemisphere Subcommittee Connie Mack (FL-14) stated:

"Given the seriously mismanaged foreign policy message coming from this Administration, it's no wonder our adversaries like Hugo Chavez continue to think they can push the envelope of the regional security in our Hemisphere. The President's domestic political calculations are dangerously hurting our presence in the region. While the stated focus of the President's trip was 'strengthening the nation's economic relationship with its neighbors and improving regional security,' it would appear the President failed on both fronts."

Mack added: "Why is anyone surprised that Secretary of State Clinton has said twice in the past week she wants out. I indeed share Secretary Clinton's frustrations with the Administration's ambiguous foreign policy, especially in the Western Hemisphere."

Colombia and Panama are vital allies in the U.S. fight against drug trafficking organizations throughout the Hemisphere. Disengagement by the Obama Administration last fall led to the Colombian announcement that drug kingpin Walid Makled-Garcia would be extradited to Venezuela and Hugo Chavez instead of the United States. This is not the first of such actions embarked on by a Colombian nation questioning their alliance with the U.S.

While President Obama was in Latin America, Chavez demanded a halt to the no fly zone and condemned Obama's actions. Chavez has also offered asylum to Dictator Muammar Gaddafi and has undertaken steps to allow the Iranians to place missile sites in Venezuela.

SOURCE Office of Congressman Connie Mack

Libya: Air China Lays on 28 Charter Flights to Evacuate 9,000 Chinese Stranded in Libya

Source: Air China

Air China has completed its biggest ever overseas humanitarian mission by evacuating 9,000 Chinese nationals from Libya, which has been suffering from widespread unrest in recent weeks. The airline laid on 28 charter flights to transport back to China the students, workers and their families, representing around a quarter of all the Chinese who have been evacuated from Libya over the past few weeks.

On receiving the evacuation request, Air China moved quickly to prepare aircraft, crews and equipment, taking just 10 hours to ready the first flight that took off from Beijing Capital International Airport on Feb. 23. Averaging nearly three flights a day, the mission was completed within the next 10 days.

However, conditions for the flights were far from ideal. There are no regular scheduled flights by Chinese airlines between China and Libya, so Air China deployed its staff based in Europe to Libya to prepare for the evacuation. The first flight arrived in Libya amid strong winds and heavy rain. Without any ground support, the crew nevertheless landed the plane smoothly by sight at 8:07AM. The bad weather continued to hamper operations, and after being checked-in manually, passengers were given hand-written boarding passes and baggage tags issued in heavy rain on the airfield.

Despite the adverse conditions, Air China nevertheless went to great lengths to make their guests comfortable. The passengers, who hadn't eaten in some time while struggling to reach the airport or had even been injured in the unrest, were provided with warm congee and biscuits before they took off. Once in the air, passengers were given more substantial meals of familiar foods such as noodles, dousha bao and salted duck eggs.

"I didn't imagine we would be able to get home so quickly," said one Chinese student. "There were 60 of us students, and we haven't eaten for several days nor dare sleep for a week. Now the ordeal is over and we're very grateful to Air China for taking us home."

Mr. Kong Dong, President of Air China, said the company was proud to have been involved in the evacuation and glad to see everyone return home safely.

Discrimination: Marine Dad Not Done Fighting Westboro Baptist Church

SOURCE The American Legion

Albert Snyder
says he is not done fighting the Westboro Baptist Church and the emotional strain its anti-gay, anti-military protests cause families at private funerals. The Maryland man who lost his 20-year-old Marine son Matthew in Iraq in 2006 has fought the church in the court system after Westboro members picketed the fallen lance corporal's funeral five years ago. The case ended early this month in the U.S. Supreme Court.

"It's been a long battle, but I'm not about to give up just because some people on the Supreme Court said (the church) could do it," Snyder told hundreds of American Legion members gathered Tuesday for the 51st Annual Washington Conference at the Downtown Renaissance Hotel and Convention Center in the nation's capital. "I will continue to press for legislation to make the picketing and protesting at funerals a little bit harder for members of the Westboro Baptist Church."

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8-1 on March 2 that the church is constitutionally protected when it demonstrates at military funerals. Church members typically hold up signs with slogans like "God Hates You" and "Fags Doom Nations" to impart its belief that military deaths are God's punishment for America's tolerance of homosexuality.

Snyder's case included a lower-court verdict in his favor that included $5 million in damages, but the case was later thrown out in a federal appeals court. The case drew national attention, pitting the First Amendment against a family's right to grieve in private.

Snyder's legal team has worked on a pro-bono basis, but costs mounted. "Adding insult to injury, Mr. Snyder is responsible for paying Westboro Church's court cost and legal fees," American Legion National Commander Jimmie Foster told the crowd in Washington. "This is simply an outrage."

To a standing ovation, Foster presented Snyder a check for $26,458.58 onstage at the conference to help cover his costs throughout the process. The majority of that money was raised online through The American Legion's Burn Pit blog site.

"Veterans have probably been my biggest supporters over the past four and a half years," Snyder explained. "I don't think I could have done what I have done without the support of all of you and all of our active-duty soldiers and Marines. I know one person who has been with me through this whole time; Matt was a very loyal son; he was a very loyal friend and brother. And I know Matt would be supporting this 100 percent because he wouldn't want to see another family go through what we went through."

Snyder asked Legionnaires to contact their lawmakers and ask them to introduce legislation that would legally restrict the church from disrupting funerals. American Legion Riders and members of the Patriot Guard commonly provide security at funerals the church plans to picket.

Libya: Will guilt at not having acted earlier provok a knee-jerk reaction with disastrous consequences?

In Libya, have certain members of the international community have once again fallen into the trap of the Balkans Syndrome, when guilt at not having acted earlier provoked a knee-jerk reaction with disastrous consequences: the travesty of international law called Kosovo? In Libya, are they protecting "civilians" or are they helping "rebels"?

Praiseworthy though it is to have preoccupations about the safety of fellow human beings, it is also the duty of the leaders of the international community to think carefully before they act and not fall into the trap of the Balkans Syndrome, when guilt at not having acted earlier provoked a knee-jerk reaction with disastrous consequences: the travesty of international law called Kosovo. And since when can a heavily armed group of bearded Islamist fanatics be described as "unarmed civilians"?

However, does anyone in the international community these days act or react through the goodness of their hearts, or through self-interest and the obligation to protect the groups that put them in power? How democratic are the "democratic" societies, when the real power is held by dark groups of grey barons who pull the corporate vested interest strings behind the scenes, and when Governments are elected depending upon how good the leader of the party looks on TV?

How democratic and free is the media when information is controlled and presented in a nice tidy package in which the truth is often suppressed or ignored and lies and misinformation manipulated?Praiseworthy though it is to have preoccupations about the well-being of people, let us look beneath the surface of the issues surrounding the attack against Libya, led by the USA, UK and France.

Firstly, was the internal situation in Libya a question of a popular uprising against oppressive standards of living while a clique of elitists bled the country dry? No, because Libya's wealth was distributed and will be, so long as Muammar Al-Qathafi retains an influence. Or was the situation in Libya fuelled by "rebels" aided and abetted and supplied from the borders to the West (Tunisia) and East (Egypt) whose governments had conveniently "fallen"? Let us take a look at where the "rebellion" started.

It did not start in Tripoli, the capital - where Muammar Al-Qathafi is so obviously still massively popular, it started in the traditionally separatist province of Cyrenaica (Benghazi) and on the western frontier.

Secondly, where are these "unarmed civilians"? It is difficult to imagine which TV set David Cameron, Barack Obama or Nicolas Sarkozy have been watching, because the "unarmed civilians" I have seen on the bank of TV sets in my editing center, linked in to a number of different stations, show heavily armed bearded marauding gangs of thugs yelling "Allahu Akhbar". Now where have I heard that before?

Thirdly, have they got it wrong again? Have they jumped the gun and been taken in by those whose intentions are neither democratic, nor that clear, and probably eventually anti-western? Remember the Mujaheddin, those "freedom fighters" in Afghanistan who destroyed women's rights in that country and then went on to morph into the Taleban? The thank you note was to be 9/11.

Fourthly, UN Resolution 1973 is sufficiently vague to have catered for a massive headache among the members of the international community. One can only imagine the shenanigans behind the scenes before its hasty adoption - it was obvious from the words of the French Foreign Minister Alain Juppé that it was to be passed even before it was voted for.

The wording of its Paragraph 4, on the Protection of Civilians, quotes Paragraph 9 of Resolution 1970 (2011), which expressly forbids the export of weapons to the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. Whoever, then, is supplying the "rebels", is breaking international law; the wording of Paragraph 4 of Resolution 1973 (2011) mentions the authority "to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya".

Does this not go against the precepts under international law that member states are free to protect themselves in cases of armed insurrection? And where does one draw the line between "protecting civilians" and attacking the Government forces, allowing the "civilians" to advance to Tripoli, as has been suggested in numerous media outlets?

Fifthly, how can a group of people in uniforms, armed with heavy weaponry, be considered "civilians" and therefore how can any substantial military attack on the forces of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya be anything except a breach of international law, occasioning interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state?

Sixthly, has President Obama gone to Congress for permission to wage war, as he is supposed to do? Has David Cameron informed those of his citizens whose maternity ward has just been closed, whose local school has been shut down, whose relative have been taunted by gangs of drunken thugs and drug addicts because the police force has been savagely reduced, quite how much money he is spending?

For those in Britain waiting for an operation, unable to get a hospital bed and whose social security benefits have been cut, sending them into misery, I am happy to inform them that the cost of a mission per aircraft per hour is between 35.000 and 50.000 pounds, or 200,000 per plane, per day. The cost of a back-seat role in a prolonged no-fly operation is in the region of 300 million pounds per year.

To do what? Help a marauding bunch of bearded fanatics seize power on Europe's doorstep?

Finally, how many of the governments involved in this manic campaign have actually bothered to research the tremendous amount Colonel Al-Qathafi has done not only for his people, but also for Africa? How many of them have stated that he was one of the first voices to ring out against Al Qaeda and international terrorism? How many have explained that he took the poorest country in the world and turned it into the one with the highest human development indices in Africa?

Why was a session arranged at the UNO later this month to praise Muammar Al-Qathafi for his human rights record? On his policy of religious tolerance... a report which praised him for protecting "not only political rights but also economic, social and cultural rights", praising him for his treatment of minorities and for the human rights training of the security forces...

Once again, the international community has been hasty, has fallen into the trap of the Balkans Syndrome, when Clinton wanted to take attention away from his midriff after what he did in the Oval Office, turning the White House into a whore house. This time around, who are the three leaders with most popularity problems at home? Barack Obama, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy, whose approval ratings are beneath those of Muammar Al-Qathafi's.

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

Pravda.Ru

Iran: UN reports more alleged violations of sanctions against Iran over nuclear issue

UN - Voicing “serious concern,” the chair of the United Nations committee monitoring the arms embargo imposed on Iran over its nuclear programme today reported two additional alleged violations involving material related to fuel enrichment or weapons delivery systems.

“While the increase in the number of reported sanctions violations is a matter of serious concern, Member States’ continuing readiness to report these violations is positive and should be encouraged,” Ambassador Ertugrul Apakan of Turkey told the Security Council in the latest regular 90-day report on the committee’s activities.

“Reports of sanctions violations by Member States represent an important source of information regarding patterns of procurement and means of circumventing sanctions,” he said, adding that the committee and its panel of experts are examining the cases.

The current alleged violations involve paragraph three of Council Resolution 1737 of 2006, which calls on all States to prevent the supply directly or indirectly from their territories or by their flag vessels or aircraft of all items that could contribute to Iran’s enrichment-related, reprocessing or heavy water-related activities, or to the development of nuclear weapon delivery systems.

Iran’s nuclear programme – which it says is for energy production but which other countries maintain is for making nuclear weapons – has been a matter of international concern since the discovery in 2003 that it had concealed its nuclear activities for 18 years in breach of its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Resolution 1737 was imposed in December 2006, and strengthened by resolution 1747 the following year which imposed a ban on arms sales to or from Iran, and expanded an existing freeze on assets.

Last December the then committee chair, Ambassador Tsuneo Nishida of Japan, reported two violations of resolution 1747. In the first case, a Member State reported seizing 13 shipping containers of illegal arms reportedly originating from Iran. In the second, another Member State informed the committee that authorities at one of its harbours had seized a container, originating from Iran and destined for Syria, holding the high-potential explosive “T4” or “RDX.”

Today Mr. Apakan said a committee panel of experts had investigated one of these cases and independently confirmed it “with the exemplary cooperation of the reporting State.”

The Council imposed a third round of sanctions in resolution 1803 in 2008, including the inspection of cargo suspected of carrying prohibited goods, tighter monitoring of financial institutions and the extension of travel bans and asset freezes.

Last June, it imposed a fourth round through resolution 1929, in which it also ruled that Iran shall not acquire an interest in any commercial activity in another State involving uranium mining, production or use of nuclear materials and technology.

India: Fukushima Disaster Impacts India

The Fukushima 1 NPP in 2002 | Credit: Wikimedia Commons

By Shastri Ramachandaran* IDN-InDepth NewsAnalysis

MUMBAI (IDN) - Uncertainty looms large over India's ambitious civilian nuclear programme as a consequence of the triple disasters that have struck Japan. For one, the civilian nuclear agreement, which New Delhi and Tokyo were negotiating, is certain to be indefinitely delayed.

Also, operationalisation of the India-U.S. civilian nuclear agreement -- touted as the biggest strategic and diplomatic accomplishment of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) is a ruling coalition of centre-left political parties heading the government of India-- may take much more time than either New Delhi or Washington anticipated.

The India-French civilian nuclear agreement may be hit harder given the increasing stridency and widening protests against the Jaitapur nuclear power project.

Tthe crisis in Japan would set back bilateral economic relations that were at an unprecedented high. While there may be a slowdown on some tracks, on others, there might be cessation of work altogether.

India-Japan relations, which thrived in the last decade and grew to become a strategic and global partnership, would lose much of the momentum it had gained in recent years.

The proposed civilian nuclear agreement would have been a high point of a bilateral relationship marked by more downs than ups (particularly after the first golden phase in the 1950s), with India’s 1998 nuclear tests taking it to the worst level.

The turning point was U.S. President Clinton’s visit in 2000. It opened Japan's eyes anew to India's potential and made it put behind the bitterness caused by the N-test. Since then, there has been no looking back with economic, political and strategic engagements moving at full speed.

Three ministerial summits every year, including of the two prime ministers, testify to the strength, depth, and potential of bilateral ties.

Although the bilateral trade volume at $10 billion is far from impressive, taken together with ODA (official development assistance, which India tops worldwide), FDI (foreign direct investment) and FII (foreign institutional investors), the level of economic cooperation is exceptionally high. The only other country in that league with Japan is the U.S. This explains why the number of Japanese companies in India trebled from 250 to 750 in the last five years. Besides, two major Japanese initiatives -- the Delhi-Mumbai industrial corridor and the Chennai-Singapore corridor -- are under way.

With the calamity claiming Japan's resources and efforts, all projects, especially those involving construction and infrastructure companies, would be badly hit. The exception might be the Chennai-Singapore project. Strategic and defence cooperation would take a backseat though political relations have reached a stage where changes in either country are unlikely to cause upsets.

While India can take the investment pullout in its stride, the blow to civilian nuclear projects threatens more than power and infrastructure development. It might turn the clock back on the pursuit of N-power as an energy option and undermine the existing N-pacts with both the U.S. and France.

Japanese nuclear technology is rated as the best and most sophisticated. That is why GE, Westinghouse and Areva have partnered Hitachi, Toshiba and Mitsubishi. Japanese expertise, technology and components are at the heart of most N-power equipment. For that reason, India's N-agreements with the U.S. and France can come unstuck in the absence of Japanese consent; which may not be forthcoming in the absence of a bilateral accord with Japan.

The Fukushima nuclear catastrophe might rekindle the historical memory of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the radiation unleashed, and the moral issues when it comes to nuclear plants.

A traumatised people would resist Tokyo even considering a nuclear agreement with India in the near future. The prevalent sentiment in Japan may boost opposition to nuclear power in India and worldwide, too. Ongoing protests, such as the one against the Jaitapur project, would acquire a new urgency.

China is calling a halt to all its nuclear projects, Germany's closure of seven N-plants and the U.S. and India ordering a safety review may not raise public confidence. On the contrary, it might add to the prevailing opposition.

The issue is not about the safety of N-plants as such. It is about public sentiment and perception driven by an emotional charge. This bodes ill for India, for the future of nuclear power, and for the present model of growth and development.

*A similar version of this article first appeared in DNA-Daily News & Analysis (www.dnaindia.com). (IDN-InDepthNews/22.03.2011)

Discrimination: Justice Dept tackles illegal exclusion of individuals with HIV/AIDS from occupational training

The Justice Department has issued letters to the attorneys general of all 50 states, as well as U.S. territories to request their assistance in addressing the illegal exclusion of individuals with HIV/AIDS from occupational training and state licensing. Persons with HIV and persons with AIDS are covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which gives federal civil rights protections to persons with disabilities in public accommodations, employment, and state and local government services.

The Justice Department has learned that public and private trade schools for barbering, cosmetology, massage therapy, home health care work and other occupations, as well as state licensing agencies, may be illegally denying individuals with HIV/AIDS admission to trade schools and/or occupational licenses because of their HIV status. However, because HIV cannot be transmitted by casual contact or by the circumstances present in these occupations, HIV-positive status is irrelevant.


In his letter to the attorneys general, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Thomas E. Perez asked that they review their respective jurisdictions’ admission and licensing criteria for trade schools and licensing agencies to identify the existence of any criteria that unlawfully exclude or discriminate against persons with HIV/AIDS, and to take the steps necessary to bring all such programs into compliance with the ADA.

“It is critical that we continue to work to eradicate discriminatory and stigmatizing treatment towards individuals with HIV based on unfounded fears and stereotypes,” Assistant Attorney General Perez said. “The ADA clearly protects individuals with HIV and other disabilities from this kind of exclusion or marginalization.”


The department recently entered into a settlement agreement with Modern Hairstyling Institute Inc., a private cosmetology school in Bayamón, Puerto Rico, for delaying the admission of an HIV-positive individual. That settlement agreement requires the school to remove questions about applicants’ HIV/AIDS status and to promptly enroll the aggrieved individual in its cosmetology program. The department has also addressed related issues in its guidance entitled “Questions and Answers: The Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rights of Persons with HIV/AIDS to Obtain Occupational Training and State Licensing”

Source: U.S. Department of Justice