By Maleeha Lodhi*
Courtesy IDN-InDepth NewsBookReview
KARACHI (IDN) - The title of the first book (Eating Grass: The Making
of the Pakistani Bomb) that authoritatively chronicles Pakistan’s
nuclear history comes from a famous remark by (former Prime Minister)
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, architect of the country's atomic programme. In an
interview with the Manchester Guardian in 1965, he said if India built
the bomb, "we will eat grass, even go hungry, but we will get one of our
own. We have no other choice."
Brig (retd) Feroz Khan's . . . book (to be published in November
2012) tells the riveting story of the country's quest for a nuclear
capability and the challenges it faced to acquire this. It offers a
fascinating portrait of the interplay between geostrategic shifts, key
political and scientific figures and evolution of strategic beliefs,
which shaped Pakistan’s nuclear decisions.
This insider account, from one long associated with the programme, is
more than an addition to the literature, which mostly casts the
Pakistani bomb in a negative light. It is the most detailed depiction of
an arduous journey that reached its destination in the 1980s and 1990s.
As the author recently told me, he was motivated to narrate this
because of the relentless disinformation campaign directed against
Pakistan’s capability. The result is a compelling tale of how it took
the country twenty-five years of gruelling effort to build a strategic
capability and even longer to transform that into an operational
deterrent with an effective delivery system.
"Darkest chapter"
Khan doesn't avoid dealing with what he characterises as the "darkest
chapter of the country’s nuclear history" when the A Q Khan
proliferation network was uncovered. The chapter devoted to this
explains how a man revered by his compatriots turned a procurement
network used to advance Pakistan’s nuclear programme into an export
enterprise that brought the country infamy from which it is still to
recover.
Although the chapter brings new facts to light, they are no more
shocking than the network's discovery in 2004. They mainly pertain to
how A Q Khan used the prime minister’s office – even after he was
removed from his organisation for engaging in suspicious activity by
General Pervez Musharraf – to write to the ruler of another country in
pursuit of proliferation activities. This agonising episode spurred
Pakistan into improving its command and control system and establishing
robust personnel reliability mechanisms.
The book's central concern however is not proliferation. It is to
explain how and why Pakistan surmounted numerous obstacles to master the
nuclear fuel cycle, pursuing both the uranium enrichment and plutonium
route, especially after 1974 when the international nonproliferation
regime tried to stop – and punish – Pakistan for India's nuclear
explosion. The book’s core thesis is that the more the US-led
international community pressured, sanctioned and denied Pakistan access
to technology, the more this galvanised national resolve and
accelerated the programme.
In demystifying this quest Khan explodes several myths popularised by
outsiders especially about the programme being 'stolen' from the West
or 'enabled' by China. This he says trivialises the indigenous
contribution of Pakistan's scientists. Technical help from China was
only sought when there was an impasse. He credits the acquisition of
nuclear capability not to one person but to the collective determination
of hundreds of people in the civil-military establishment, but above
all, the scientific community who believed in achieving nuclear
self-sufficiency.
National consensus
This pursuit was backed by a rare national consensus. This survived
changes of government and domestic turmoil that punctuated Pakistan's
political history. Khan also describes the epic rivalry between two key
nuclear institutions: the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission and what
later became Khan Research Laboratories. While endemic professional
jealousy slowed the nuclear endeavour, it also spurred innovation that
produced eventual success. Some leaders even encouraged the 'clash of
the Khans'- A Q and Munir Ahmed Khan, who headed the PAEC.
In tracking the early history, the author casts Ayub Khan as a
cautious leader who kept the programme focused on peaceful pursuits and
tried to curb the ambition of the nuclear lobby, led by Bhutto, Agha
Shahi, and Aziz Ahmed. The split between these two camps "drove
Pakistan’s policy choices". The rise and fall of Ayub and Bhutto and two
top scientists, Dr Abdus Salam and Dr Ishrat Usmani determined the
country’s nuclear journey.
1971 and the 'never again' paradigm that emerged after defeat and
dismemberment proved pivotal in the decision to build the bomb.
"Pakistan’s humiliation would lay the foundation for a shift in the once
peaceful nature of the nuclear programme," writes Khan. The 1971
debacle and India’s 1974 nuclear test turned a minority viewpoint into
consensus on the imperative of acquiring nuclear weapons. The more
India’s nuclear activities were internationally tolerated the greater
was Pakistan’s sense of discrimination.
What ultimately determined nuclear success was the cadre of
scientists and engineers whose talent was tapped in the country's early
years and who were motivated by the resolve not to let India’s strategic
advances go "unanswered".
While Khan regards Pakistan's nuclear journey unique in many respects
– "no other nuclear power acquired a nuclear capability in the face of
efforts to derail the programme" – he also points to similarities with
the motivation and rationale of other nuclear powers. All sought the
'ultimate weapon' as a response to insecurity and 'balancing’ against
foreign military or political threats. He identifies three common themes
among nuclear aspirants: national humiliation, international isolation,
and national identity. They were recurrent themes in Pakistan’s case,
providing the basis for its strategic perceptions.
Pakistan-US relations
The rollercoaster nature of Pakistan-US relations emerges as an
important, explanatory factor in the evolution of the country’s nuclear
effort. This unedifying engagement- and the mutual disappointments that
accompanied it – reinforced Islamabad’s thinking that in confronting
security threats Pakistan could only rely on itself. Moreover decades of
discriminatory sanctions, embargos and coercive pressure left many
Pakistanis with the impression that its capability was also being
targeted for its "Muslimness".
An aspect of the programme's early history revealed in the book is
how little the military initially had to do with it. The author depicts
GHQ as a later convert to the nuclear idea, with 1974 becoming the
defining moment. It was Ghulam Ishaq Khan who from the beginning was "by
far the greatest silent patron and contributor" to Pakistan's nuclear
programme. When the 1993 political crisis culminated in the removal of
the prime minister and president, on his last day in office GIK
reluctantly handed over all nuclear-related documents to the new chief
of army staff General Abdul Waheed Kakar. This, says Khan, marked the
first time the army assumed responsibility for the nuclear programme.
Any history summarising decades of nuclear endeavour can be expected
to contain gaps in the account. Those actively involved in the project
will probably find many. But for this scribe the book fails to
acknowledge the role of Pakistani diplomats especially in the crucial
years leading up to the nuclear tests in 1998. This was the period of
wide-ranging sanctions and unprecedented US pressure to compel Pakistan
to change course. The front line role of diplomats like Munir Akram in
framing and articulating Pakistan’s nuclear policy as well as shaping
its negotiating position in key international forums deserved special
mention. The impression left by the book that soldiers, not diplomats,
crafted and conducted nuclear diplomacy to fend off international
pressure is not accurate. The foreign ministry played an impressive role
in this regard.
The book nevertheless offers a tribute to all who silently or
stridently ensured the success of the project. But the nuclear story
inescapably raises a what-if question on a fundamental issue. If the
country's economic progress had received similar priority and been
pursued with the same discipline and consensus Pakistan would not be the
shambles that it is today. This irony doesn’t escape the author. He
frequently reminds the reader that while possession of a nuclear
capability provided Pakistan a partial check against external
aggression, it did nothing – nor could it – to address the greater risks
to its security and stability, from internal turmoil and conflict.
*Dr Maleeha Lodhi is a journalist, special adviser to the Jang Group/Geo, academic and diplomat from Pakistan. She was Pakistan's High Commissioner to the UK and Ambassador to the United States. She has also been a member of the UN Secretary-General's Advisory Board on Disarmament. This book review first appeared in the print edition of Pakistan's News International from Pakistan on August 31, 2012 and is re-published in view of the importance of the book.
**Feroz H Khan, Eating Grass: The Making of the Pakistani Bomb, Stanford University Press, 2012. [IDN-InDepthNews – September 2, 2012]
2012 IDN-InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters
Portrait image: Maleeha Lodhi | Credit: The News International