Source: Human Rights Watch
Sculptors Risk Jail for Works ‘Offensive to Islam’
(Tunis) - Tunisian prosecutors should drop charges against two sculptors
for art works deemed harmful to public order and good morals. The
criminal prosecution of artists for works of art that do not incite
violence or discrimination violate the right to freedom of expression.
Nadia Jelassi and Mohamed Ben Salem, whose works were exhibited in a
show in La Marsa in June 2012, could be sentenced to up to five years in
prison if convicted. Their mixed-media work provoked protests during
the exhibit.
“Time and again, prosecutors are using criminal legislation to stifle
critical or artistic expression,” said Eric Goldstein, deputy Middle
East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. “Bloggers,
journalists and now artists are being prosecuted for exercising their
right to free speech.”
Jelassi’s contribution to the “Printemps des arts” exhibit was a work
entitled “Celui qui n’a pas…” (“He who hasn’t…”), which includes
sculptures of veiled women in the midst of a pile of stones. Ben Salem’s
contribution depicted a line of ants streaming out of a child's
schoolbag to spell “Allah.”
The investigative judge of the First Degree Court of Tunis informed the
two artists in August that they faced charges under article 121.3 of
the penal code.
The exhibition was in a state-owned hall in La Marsa known as
al-Abdelliya, in the northern suburbs of Tunis, from June 1 to 10. On
June 10, three people, including a court official, asked one of the
gallery directors to remove two paintings they judged offensive by 6
p.m. Meanwhile, a campaign gathered steam on Facebook condemning the
exhibit as anti-Islamic.
That night, dozens of people broke into the palace and vandalized some
of the artworks before the police dispersed them. On June 11, riots
erupted in several locations across the country, with protesters setting
fire to courts, police stations, and other state institutions. One
civilian died in the violence and dozens were wounded. Several preachers
in mosques across the country condemned the art show, some openly
calling on their followers to put the artists to death as apostates.
Jelassi told Human Rights Watch that she received a phone call from the
judicial police some days after the incidents informing her that they
had opened an inquiry into the events of “al-Abdelliya.” On August 17,
she went to the First Degree Court of Tunis, at their request, where the
investigative judge of the second bureau informed her that she faced
charges of “harming public order and public morals,” under penal code
article 121.3. On August 28, the investigative judge questioned her.
“I felt like I was in the times of the Inquisition,” she told Human
Rights Watch. “The investigative judge asked me about my intentions
behind my works that were on exhibit at the show, and whether I had
intended to provoke with this work.”
The United Nations Human Rights Committee has said that laws
prohibiting expression deemed to show a lack of respect for a religion
or other belief system are incompatible with international law, apart
from the very limited circumstances in which religious hatred amounts to
incitement to violence or discrimination.
The case is at least the fourth in which prosecutors have used article
121.3 of the penal code to bring charges for speech deemed offensive to
public morality and public order since the country’s new National
Constituent Assembly convened in November 2011. On March 28, the first
instance tribunal of Mahdia sentenced two bloggers to prison terms of
seven and a half years for publishing writings perceived as offensive to
Islam.
On May 3, Nabil Karoui, the owner of the television station Nessma TV,
was fined 23,000 dinars (US$1,490) for broadcasting the animated film
Persepolis, denounced as blasphemous by some Islamists. On March 8,
Nasreddine Ben Saida, publisher of the newspaper Attounssia, was fined
1,000 dinars (US$623) for publishing a photo of a football star
embracing his naked girlfriend.
The penal code’s article 121.3 makes it an offense to “distribute,
offer for sale, publicly display, or possess, with the intent to
distribute, sell, display for the purpose of propaganda, tracts,
bulletins, and fliers, whether of foreign origin or not, that are liable
to cause harm to the public order or public morals.”
“Many Tunisians expected that repressive laws like article 121.3 would
not long outlast the dictator who adopted it,” Goldstein said. “We now
see that as long as the transitional government does not make it a
priority to get rid of these laws, the temptation to use them to silence
those who dissent or think differently is irresistible.”