Photo: Wendy Stone/IRIN. The Global Fund has distributed more than seven million insecticide-treated nets in Uganda
Source: IRIN
KAMPALA, 1 October 2012 (IRIN) - Recent allegations of the misuse of a
grant from the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria could
jeopardize Uganda’s malaria funding and hurt efforts to the disease,
which is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity.
Evidence of the mismanagement of a US$51 million malaria grant to Uganda
from the Global Fund resulted in the July arrest of three Ministry of
Health employees and prompted a police investigation into the matter. In
September, the organization called for the refund of any ineligible expenses under the grant and the strengthening of safeguards to prevent future misappropriation of funds.
Global Fund-supported programmes provide life-prolonging treatment for
some 291,000 HIV-positive Ugandans - more than 80 percent of the total
number receiving treatment - and have distributed 7.7 million
insecticide-treated nets to protect families from malaria.
In November 2011, the Global Fund commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers -
the local fund agent - to review transactions relating to a Round 7
malaria grant, inaugurated in 2009, to procure and distribute 7.4
million long-lasting, insecticide-treated mosquito nets. Following the
review, the Fund recommended "strengthening accounting records,
reinforcing internal controls and oversight of programmes".
Marcela Rojo, a Global Fund spokesperson, said the Round 7 malaria grant
had not been suspended, but told IRIN/PlusNews in an email that “any
country where the Global Fund identifies irregularities in the use of
funding is subject to [a] freeze or suspension of funds”.
In its mid-September announcement, the Fund called for an immediate end
to transfers of programme funds to individuals' bank accounts. Rojo said
the transfer of Fund money to personal accounts was against the law in
Uganda and should not have been allowed to happen under current
guidelines.
A suspension would be devastating to the country’s efforts to fight
malaria, said Nathan Kenya-Mugisha, a technical advisor for health
programmes in the Ministry of Health; the country’s most recent Malaria Control Strategic Plan reported that between 70,000 and 100,000 people die each year from the disease.
“Malaria was not attracting development partners until the Global Fund
arrived,” he said, adding that a suspension could see the country face a
shortage of drugs and supplies for treatment and prevention of the
disease.
History of misuse
These are just the latest episodes in Uganda’s rocky history with the Global Fund; a 2005 audit revealed massive graft,
leading the Fund to suspend five grants to the country. The grants were
reinstated several months later, and several people have since been jailed in connection with the scandal.
Uganda also lost out on a $16 million grant in 2007 because of the country's "unsatisfactory performance", according to Aidspan, an NGO that serves as an independent watchdog of the Fund.
Asuman Lukwago, the permanent secretary for Uganda's Ministry of Health,
said the country was committed to returning any misallocated funds and
to holding any culprits accountable.
"Our final beneficiaries should not be made to suffer because of the
motives of some public servants," he said. "Everything that disturbed
the Fund will be answerable by the public servants."
Lukwago said the possible corruption surrounding the malaria grant was
uncovered by his department, which, working with Global Fund officers,
discovered that "there could be fraud in the management of the money".
Improved financial tracking
Ministry officials are now looking at methods to better track and
monitor funds and the supplies they purchase. Lukwago said ministry
officials were in talks with the Swedish government about a programme to
regularize accounting.
The ministry is also considering implementing an 'e-health' initiative
that would provide for better online resource tracking as supplies are
procured and distributed. Lukwago said it would be a way to take
stronger preventive action rather than waiting for reports of corruption
and then "discover there is something wrong".
Peter Wandera, the executive director of the Ugandan chapter of Transparency International, said the recent events showed the ministry's oversight system had improved significantly since the last major scandal.
"The issue was taken up and people were arrested," he said. "At least we have seen the process working."
Raymond Byaruhanga, the executive director of Uganda's AIDS Information
Centre, sits on the Country Coordinating Mechanism (CCM) that oversees
Global Fund money and says the system has become more transparent but
“loopholes” still exist.
He pointed to the funding distribution system in which the Ministry of
Health picked local partners to help implement grant projects; some of
the money went to "organizations that are not existing on the ground".
Additionally, a lack of clarity in accountability rules had led some
NGOs to become fearful of utilizing the funds, leaving gaps in the
implementation of programmes.
"As the CCM and civil society, we can continue to push for better systems and improvement," Byaruhanga said.