Photo: Jennifer Lazuta/IRIN. Women farmers planting millet seeds in Rassomde, Burkina Faso, in the lead-up to rainy season
Source: IRIN
DAKAR, 5 July 2013 (IRIN) - Boosting agricultural productivity in the
Sahel region is crucial to reduce chronic food insecurity, improve
families' nutrition, promote economic growth and help build people's
resilience, say experts, but governments still under-fund the sector, as
do international donors who favour short-term fixes.
While there has been a renewed interest in investing in agriculture over
the past five years, partly spurred by a drive towards more
self-sufficiency given rising food prices (which spiked in 2008 and
remained high), the sector is still under-served.
In 2009 the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) renewed
the 2003 Maputo pledge to commit at least 10 percent of their national
budgets to agriculture. But as the accord approaches its 10-year
anniversary later this month, only 10 of the 54 African Union countries
have met this goal.
While growth in small-scale agriculture can benefit the poor twice as
much as growth in other sectors, global development aid for agriculture
declined by 77 percent between 1983 and 2006, according to a report by NGO Oxfam.
In Senegal, for example, where agriculture accounts for nearly 14
percent of the country's GDP and employs more than two-thirds of the
labour force, NGO ActionAid says the government invested just 4.7
percent of its budget on agriculture in 2012.
Consciousness did rise, however, in 2008, when food prices spiked and
West African governments realized they were overly dependent on imported
staple grains.
"Many countries realized that being too dependent on the international
market was not sustainable, and from that moment on, said 'OK, if we
want to be able to feed ourselves and if we want to improve the food
security of our populations, we need to have a minimum level of food
sovereignty. And to do this, we need to invest more in agriculture',"
said Eric Hazard, campaign manager for Oxfam's GROW campaign. Since then "agriculture has been back on the agenda in the region."
But in those countries that have achieved the 10 percent goal, such as
Burkina Faso and Niger, Hazard said the quality of the investment
remains an issue.
"When you secure, say, 17 percent of your budget for agriculture, but
only spend 65-70 percent of that on farmers, and the rest goes to
expenditures of the Ministry, such as meetings, salaries, 4x4s, etc.,
you haven't really hit that 10 percent mark," he told IRIN.
Benefiting the poor
Investment in smallholder farmers is especially important, as not only
do they contribute to an estimated 80 percent of the continent's food
production, but they are also among the region's most vulnerable and
food insecure people.
"In most countries in West Africa, the majority of the population lives
in rural areas, where agriculture is the main provider of food and
income," said NGO Catholic Relief Services' (CRS) regional technical
adviser for agriculture Mireille Totobesola Barbier. "But production
assets and financial access constraints, limited knowledge of improved
production techniques and marketing skills, all impede growth [in the
sector]," she said.
In the Sahel, repeat drought also impedes projects to boost production.
It can take 3-4 years to recover from a crisis like the 2012 drought,
and only if those years are good, said Food and Agriculture Organization
(FAO) regional head Patrick David. "There has been a gradual erosion of
farmers' livelihoods in the Sahel - more and more farmers are moving to
cities," he said.
When a harvest fails, small farmers will sell the few animals they have;
pull their children from school; become further indebted; exhaust their
food and seed stocks; become more food insecure; and will be all the
weaker in the face of the next crisis. This is the cycle of
impoverishment in the Sahel, said David.
Burden on aid agencies
The lack of or poorly directed government funding has put increased
pressure on aid agencies to secure donor funding, which is a struggle.
"Donors are often more keen to give money toward emergency or crisis
situations [as opposed to long-term development projects], where you
might not see the impact of the investment right away," said the World
Food Programme's West Africa focal point for its Purchase for Progress
scheme, Isabelle Mballa.
FAO for example, called for US$122 million to aid agriculture in the
2012 Sahel food security crisis, but only 48 percent of the requested
funds were received. Activities that suffered included seed
distribution, soil and water conservation projects, vaccinating animals,
sending fodder to animals, and other schemes.
This year, agriculture has received just 23 percent of the agricultural funds it has called for, for the Sahel.
This underfunding has especially affected smallholder farmers, who often
cannot afford basic inputs, such as seeds and fertilizers, and cannot
access credit. Not only does their overall agricultural productivity
suffer, but a lack of investment puts them at an increased risk of
vulnerability during times of crisis and increases their dependence on
external food aid.
FAO has three main areas of emergency response in the Sahel: supporting
families to plant market gardens in the dry season; supporting rain-fed
planting during the July-September rainy season; and helping families
practice planting when water recedes from flood plains from August to
December.
This year's poor funding response means "it's too late to do any more
for this year's rain-fed harvest," said David. As Robert Piper, humanitarian coordinator for the Sahel, put it, "The window is closed."
What smallholder farmers need
Todd Crosby, the assistant director for YaaJeende, USAID's Feed the
Future's Senegal programme, told IRIN: "The idea [behind investing in
smallholder farmers] is to give them everything they need in order to
succeed. It's to provide them with things like seeds, fertilizer, tools,
and crop and livestock insurance. Teach them better land preparation
and irrigation techniques, if they need. Help them get their product to
the market."
By doing so, farmers can not only produce more, high-quality crops -
which will increase their incomes - but can also help reduce the rates
of undernutrition and malnutrition in the country.
Research from Feed the Future, which works with 12 African countries to
reduce poverty and undernutrition through investing in agriculture, says
it was able to increase the value of food exports by $84 million in
2012 by focusing on smallholder folders. This has meant that more than
seven million smallholder farmers in the region saw increased profits
last year.
CRS's Development Assistant Programme in Burkina Faso helped increase
the crop yields of millet and sorghum by an average of 30 percent
between 2004 and 2010, simply by teaching smallholder farmers how to
better manage water, preserve good seeds for replanting, and other
activities.
Despite these and other successes, donors shy away from funding
smallholder farmers, favouring emergency aid or larger-scale
agribusiness.
"These small farmers, they are seen as not being competitive with
large-scale producers, because they don't have the tools, the
technology, the resources or the means," said WFP's Mballa. Many believe
smallholders cannot produce quality products in sufficient quantities.
"But if they [smallholder farmers] are just given a little help, they
too can be successful. Being a small-scale farmer does not mean you
can't be productive and that you cannot earn money."
Try machines
USAID's Crosby said there now needs to be shift towards mechanized
agriculture, as well as agricultural credit for smallholder farmers.
"Smallholder farmers often lack tractors and other machinery in the
field, and there's only so much you can do with a hand hoe. But in order
to get those tools, you need to have access to credit." He told IRIN.
While there are currently a variety of microfinance schemes that offer
farmers' agricultural credit, Oxfam's Hazard said most have loan rates
of 14-30 percent, which makes it nearly impossible for small farmers to
earn enough money to pay back the principal plus interest within the
six-month lending period, and still earn a profit.
Many of these microfinance schemes also tend to target larger-scale, urban producers.
"It's a lot harder to work with small, rural farmers because they're
much more dispersed and also riskier, than a few big companies or
producers," Crosby said. "Their [smallholder farmers'] livelihoods - and
the ability to pay back the loan - often depend on weather and other
factors outside their control."
Crop and livestock insurance is one answer - it could help reduce some
of the production risks, and make farmers more adaptable and resilient
to climate change. The question is: where are the investors to make this
work?