Photo: Kristy Siegfried/IRIN. A new fence at the Greek/Turkish border has added to the obstacles for Syrian asylum seekers trying to reach Europe
Source: IRIN
JOHANNESBURG, 25 September 2013 (IRIN) - The human exodus from Syria
started with a trickle in the latter half of 2011 that became a steady
stream in 2012, and turned into a flood in 2013. The UN Refugee Agency
(UNHCR) estimates that on average 5,000 Syrians flee their country every
day and that by mid-September around 2.1 million were living as
refugees, mainly in neighbouring countries. Lebanon alone has taken in 752,000, while Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt have also accepted hundreds of thousands.
The Turkish government says it has spent $2 billion responding to the
refugee influx from Syria while Jordan has spent a similar amount just
during the first nine months of 2013. A recent World Bank report
estimated that the conflict and the waves of refugees it has created
has doubled unemployment in Lebanon, cut GDP growth and strained health,
education, water and sanitation systems to breaking point.
Although the European Union (EU) has committed US$1.75 billion to relief
efforts in and around Syria, making it the largest international donor,
it has shown little solidarity with countries like Turkey, Jordan and
Lebanon, in terms of helping to shoulder an increasingly unmanageable
refugee burden.
Despite its relative proximity to the conflict, Europe is hosting just
41,000 Syrian asylum seekers, the majority of them in two countries -
Germany and Sweden.
Not only does the EU lack a joint policy to govern the treatment and
protection of Syrian asylum seekers by its member states, Europe’s
fortress-like borders are making it extremely difficult for Syrians to
reach EU territory.
A report
released earlier this month by the European Council on Refugees and
Exiles (ECRE) notes: “Access to Europe is increasingly difficult, and
legal channels of entering the EU are almost non-existent, especially as
Member States closed their embassies in Syria.”
Gaining entry to the EU
For many refugees the only option is to pay smugglers to help them enter
EU territory irregularly, but even this has become more difficult. The
206km Greek/Turkish border used to be the main entry point to the EU for
migrants and asylum seekers, but in August 2012, the Greek government,
with assistance from the European border agency, Frontex, significantly
tightened frontier security measures, including erecting a 12km stretch
of fence along one of the most popular crossing points.
Most Syrian asylum seekers attempting to reach Europe now use much riskier sea routes between Turkey and the Greek islands
and between Egypt and the south coast of Italy. While a number of
deaths from drowning and dehydration have been reported, UNHCR estimates
that 4,600 Syrians arrived in Italy by sea between January and early
September 2013, two-thirds of them in August.
Increasing numbers are also entering Europe via Bulgaria, where
reception centres have reached capacity. An unknown number of asylum
seekers are now being kept in two detention centres while their asylum applications are decided, which can take as long as a year.
“The EU has in the past urged Turkey to keep its borders open to Syrians
wishing to seek asylum, while at the same time focusing resources on
controlling irregular entry at its own external frontiers,” said António
Guterres, UN High Commissioner for Refugees, at a meeting of the EU Justice and Home Affairs Council in July.
“While the management of borders is a sovereign right and legitimate
priority of states, the means must be found to ensure that Syrians
seeking protection at EU frontiers can gain access to territory,
procedures and safety,” Guterres noted. He also expressed concern about
the lack of consistency among Member States in their adjudication of
asylum claims from Syrians, and the types of protection being granted.
The EU still has a long way to go in implementing a Common European Asylum System, with some states much less likely to grant refugee status than others. Greece,
for example, has a notoriously dysfunctional asylum system, and granted
refugee status to only two out of 275 Syrians who applied in 2012,
according to UNHCR. In the same year, nearly 8,000 Syrians were arrested
and detained for irregularly entering or staying in Greece.
Although the Greek Ministry of Public Order and Citizen Protection has
since ordered that Syrians only be detained for as long as it takes to
verify their identity and then released, most of those with the means to
do so move on to countries where they will have a better chance of
receiving protection.
Protection can vary
Recognition rates for Syrian asylum seekers are generally high elsewhere
in Europe, but the ECRE report notes that a number of countries are
granting subsidiary or humanitarian protection rather than refugee
status, despite the fact that, as Guterres put it, “people fleeing Syria
fall squarely within the framework of the 1951 Refugee Convention, and should be granted protection accordingly”.
Syrians with subsidiary and humanitarian protection status are usually
only given residence permits valid for one year (instead of three years
for refugees) and may not be entitled to social welfare.
Sweden recently set what refugee rights groups are hoping is a precedent
by granting permanent residency to approximately 8,000 Syrian asylum
seekers in the country on temporary residency permits.
Besides granting refugee status to Syrians, the other option being urged
by UNHCR is for Member States to accept Syrian refugees for emergency
resettlement or humanitarian admission (a more temporary form of
protection than refugee status). In March, Germany announced a
Humanitarian Admissions Programme that will host 5,000 Syrians for two
years, with priority given to those already registered in Lebanon or who
have family in Germany.
UNHCR announced in June that it was seeking humanitarian admission for
10,000 Syrian refugees, and resettlement for an additional 2,000 in
acute need. So far, 10 countries (seven in Europe) have pledged a total
of 1,650 resettlement places, but besides Germany only Austria has
agreed to the humanitarian admission of 500 Syrians.
In the context of a conflict that it is creating 5,000 new refugees
every day, rights groups have been critical of such minimal commitments.
The figures also seem meagre compared to the tens of thousands of
refugees that individual countries took in during the Kosovo and Bosnian
conflicts.
Julia Zelvenskaya, of ECRE, attributed the disappointing response to a
generally negative political climate for migrants and refugees in Europe
at the moment. “Few European leaders are saying they welcome refugees,”
she told IRIN. “Some countries are only willing to resettle 30 people,
and when you compare the numbers being hosted by neighbouring countries
[such as Jordan and Lebanon], it doesn’t really show a sharing of
responsibility.”
The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE) Group, a political party in the European Parliament, has called for a humanitarian conference to address the issue of facilitating temporary access to the EU for those fleeing the conflict.
An EU-wide temporary protection regime could be implemented using a directive adopted in 2001 following the Kosovo conflict, but would require the approval of all Member States.
“We have instruments we could use if we chose to deploy them, but you
need the political will to do so,” said Guillaume McLaughlin, an ALDE
policy advisor. “We’ve had a lot of rhetoric [on this issue], but no
action.”
Zelvenskaya said it may be too soon to implement the EU directive on
temporary protection, given that the numbers of Syrian asylum seekers
reaching Europe are still relatively small. Measures could instead be
taken to open legal channels to the EU, for example, by relaxing current
visa restrictions and family reunification rules for Syrians, and
issuing humanitarian visas through embassies in neighbouring countries.