Photo: Plant Stories Project. More than 2 million Zimbabweans - or a quarter of the rural population - are food insecure
Source: IRIN
HARARE, 28 January 2014 (IRIN) - A Zimbabwe state mechanism designed to
promote food security is being blamed for exacerbating the country’s
chronic food shortages.
The failure by the 83-year-old state-run Grain Marketing Board (GMB) to
pay producers for their grain in recent years has short-circuited the
ability of small-scale farmers to generate cash flow to fund
agricultural inputs for the following season - a problem recognized by
President Robert Mugabe’s ruling ZANU-PF party.
The Zimbabwe Vulnerability Assessment Committee,
with a membership drawn from the government, the UN World Food
Programme and other partners, estimates that 2.2 million people, or a quarter of the rural population, require food assistance during the 2014 “lean season” - the few months before the harvest in March.
Small-scale farmers are the backbone of the country’s food security and
provide about 70 percent of its staple crop, maize, according to
agricultural analysts and government estimates.
Denford Gwara, 48, a small-scale farmer who used to produce wheat and
maize on 40 hectares of land in Mazowe, Mashonaland Central province,
told IRIN the GMB owed him US$9,000 for produce he had delivered in the
past two harvests.
“I have visited GMB on numerous occasions but they keep telling me that
government has not given them money to pay me. Last year, they offered
to pay off part of the debt with fertilizer and maize seed, but only
gave me a few bags, which were too little for me to make any meaningful
farming,” he said.
As a result, he has had to reduce the area of land he tills to only five
hectares, and had to sell his old truck to raise money for inputs.
“I know of many farmers in this area who are crying because their
ability to farm has been badly affected by GMB’s inability to pay them.
Many people used to admire me for the many tonnes of wheat and maize I
used to produce, but I can hardly keep my children in school now,” he
said.
The GMB’s primary role is to ensure national food security by promoting
crop production - mainly cereals - as well as the procurement, free
distribution and sales of harvested grains, and managing the country’s
strategic grain reserves. It also has a commercial department that
processes and sells agricultural products such as oil seeds, rice,
groundnuts, coffee and popcorn.
At a recent media briefing in the capital, Harare, minister of
agriculture Joseph Made said, “At the moment, most farmers are using
limited financial resources. They need the money that GMB owes them.
Government cannot expect farmers to produce when it is failing to pay them for their produce.”
Millions of dollars owed
Made acknowledged that the GMB owed farmers more than US$6 million. He
said his ministry was “battling with treasury” and hoped the finance
ministry would “assist, so that farmers have the money they need to
finance their operations”.
The GMB’s general manager, Albert Mandizha, dismissed the complaints of
small-scale farmers in 2013, claiming the organization had paid 98
percent of all monies owed to them. “I am ashamed of Zimbabwean farmers.
You are an embarrassment because you have forced us to import grain,”
he said.
Subsequently, GMB spokesperson Muriel Zimunya told IRIN in written
responses to questions about delayed payments that the board needed to
“incentivise farmers by paying promptly”.
Even before the land reform programme in
2000, when about 4,500 white-owned farms - accounting for about 39
percent of the country’s land - was redistributed to an estimated
245,000 black farmers, small-scale farmers were a central pillar in the
nation’s food security.
After independence from Britain in 1980, price controls on maize
increased the trend by white commercial farmers to resort to cash crops
like tobacco, paprika, cut flowers and cotton, and growing yellow maize
for stock feed, entrenching cereal production as largely the preserve of communal black farmers.
In the aftermath of the land reform programme, large-scale
agro-businesses collapsed, as did the access of small-scale farmers to
cheaper agricultural inputs facilitated by the large-scale demands of
commercial farmers. The imposition of sanctions for human rights abuses
further squeezed an already fragile economy.
A 2012 report on
Zimbabwe’s agricultural reconstruction, jointly commissioned by the
Development Bank of Southern Africa (DBSA) and the French Agency for
Development (AFD) listed deteriorating infrastructure for the marketing
and movement of produce, and the limited access of farmers to finance,
among the constraints to productivity.
It noted that shortages of fuel and power, in addition to poor training
and limited agricultural extension services, were also hampering food
production.
Eddie Cross, a farmer, agricultural consultant and member of the
opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) party, told IRIN the
failure by GMB to pay farmers timeously was “a serious issue that
requires urgent government intervention”.
“In the old days, farmers would get their money within a week after
delivering produce. The farmers would then start planning for the next
farming season and know how much to set aside for personal consumption.
They would be able to buy inputs on time and before prices shot up,
unlike now,” Cross said.
He estimated the number of small-scale farmers in Zimbabwe - those on
communal land as well as those resettled through land reform - at about
700,000, noting that about half of them had been “severely affected” by
non-payment or delayed payment from the GMB.
“It is confusing that the government is prepared to annually hunt for money to import food,
when it should be prioritizing raising money to allocate to GMB for
farmers’ payments as a way to ensure that production improves,” he said.
“While a significant number of farmers [are] now preferring to either
hold onto their produce or sell to private buyers, thousands still
surrender their crops to GMB because they keep getting promises that
this time around, their money will be paid promptly,” Cross said.
Hyperinflation’s hangover
The Zimbabwe Commercial Farmers’ Union (ZCFU) said the GMB started
struggling to make timely payments to farmers in 2009, when the
government adopted a multi-currency system and abandoned the local
Zimbabwe dollar to escape hyperinflation that had affected the economy
from the early 2000s.
“GMB still owes farmers money dating back to that period [2009] and,
currently, tens of thousands of farmers are yet to get their cash for
delivering maize and other crops to the parastatal, and this is a
national disaster,” Wonder Chabikwa, the ZCFU president, told IRIN.
“The failure by GMB to make timely payments has affected national
production. Smallholder farmers form the bulk of those affected, but
those farming on a commercial basis are also victims.
“If the farmers are not paid on time, where do they get the money to buy
inputs and equipment for use in the next farming season? What it means
is that they reduce their hectarage, or completely fail to till their
land. Those that can, would have borrowed money to farm, and their
property is attached by banks and other lenders when they are not paid,”
Chabikwa said.
“Granted, drought
and the delayed distribution of inputs are also behind poor
agricultural production - particularly that of maize - over the years,”
he said. “But one untold story is that GMB’s inability to pay farmers is
a major factor that has affected their capacity to prepare and produce
meaningful yields, leading to recurrent food insecurity.”