Source: Human Rights Watch
Dispatches: Opaque As Ever at Guantanamo
by Andrea Prasow
Nineteen minutes. That’s how long the review hearing for a Guantanamo
detainee lasted this morning. Or, to be more exact, that’s as much of
the proceeding as nine reporters and four representatives from
nongovernmental organizations were permitted to observe, via video feed,
from a secure conference room in Arlington, Virginia. The rest of the
proceeding was considered classified, including anything the detainee
would say. Weeks from now, a redacted transcript will be made public.
The US military Periodic Review Boards were
created to assess whether to continue to detain Guantanamo detainees
who are not being prosecuted and haven’t already been slated for
release. The administration deems these men too dangerous to release but
doesn’t have enough admissible evidence or a legal ground to prosecute
them.
No observers or media were allowed to attend the first Periodic Review
Board in November 2013 – a review of a Yemeni man that resulted in the
Board ordering him approved for release. But the Pentagon announced
public access for this and future Board proceedings. The review board is
made up of representatives from the Departments of Defense, State,
Justice, and Homeland Security, along with the Office of the Director of
National Intelligence, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
But access is relative. Observers were permitted to see only the portion
of the proceedings in which the detainee’s counsel and “personal
representative” – a military officer appointed by the military – read
prepared statements (statements, moreover, that had been posted on
the Defense Department’s website the night before). The scripted
proceeding – so scripted that the clerk read out the start time as “9
a.m.” even though a glance at her watch would have told her the hearing
actually started at 9:15 – offered no insight into the purpose of the
hearing, which was to determine if Abdel Malik Al Rahabi should, after
12 years in Guantanamo, continue to be held “to protect against a
continuing and significant threat to the United States and its
interests.” The Pentagon’s two-paragraph prepared statement claimed
without supporting evidence that Al Rahabi was once a member of Al
Qaeda, but that if repatriated he would probably live peacefully with
his family in Yemen.
The Obama administration has claimed to
be the most transparent administration in history, yet when faced with
an opportunity to provide greater transparency about what takes place at
Guantanamo, it has erred on
the side of secrecy. While men like Al Rahabi should never have been
held for years without trial, the Periodic Review Boards at least
provide a chance for some prisoners to be allowed to go home. But
instead of demonstrating a fair and open process, today’s proceeding was
a reminder both to the prisoners and the world that Guantanamo has
always been a place where the truth remains hidden.