IFEX
Reporters Without Borders
Reporters Without Borders urges the Algerian authorities to allow both
Algerian and foreign journalists to freely cover tomorrow's [17 April
2014] presidential election.
“We registered arrests of Algerian journalists during street
protests against President Abdelaziz Bouteflika's decision to run for a
fourth term, and this does not bode well for their ability to cover this
elections in an unimpeded manner,” said Lucie Morillon, head of
research at Reporters Without Borders.
“As for foreign journalists, many of them were issued visas late in
the day accompanied by drastic restrictions, and yet the international
media have a important role to play in a country in which the domestic
media are badly lacking in pluralism and the level of self-censorship is
very high.”
Minefield for foreign journalists
The Algerian authorities tightened their grip on visa requests by
foreign journalists. Visas are usually issued in two weeks but have been
taking much longer in the run-up to the elections.
Journalists with French media (L'Express, Le Point, Journal du Dimanche, Le Monde and BFMTV), German media (FAZ and ZDF) and Spanish media (Agencia EFE and El Mundo) have all had to wait many weeks and have only received visas in the past few days.
They will be able to cover voting day itself but, in practice, they
have been prevented from doing any investigative reporting ahead of what
is a crucial election for Algeria, one marked by protests about
Bouteflika's candidacy and questions about his health problems, which
have prevented him from campaigning.
Some media told Reporters Without Borders that the late delivery of
visas has forced them to abandon plans for certain stories and campaign
coverage.
The visas are subject to geographic, editorial and time
restrictions. Foreign reporters must obtain special permits to visit
certain regions. The documents they get from the information ministry
instruct them to limit their questions to matters relating to the election.
And the visits expire on 20 April, just three days after the first
round, which suggests that either the authorities are ruling out a
second round or intend to subject journalists to a second application
process.
Difficulties covering pre-election protests
Several journalists were arrested while covering pre-election protests or were harassed afterwards for reporting them.
Echorouk TV reporter Zineb Benzita said she and several other journalists were arrested while covering a demonstration
outside the Benyoucef-Benkhedda Faculty in Algiers in 1 March. “I
wasn't participating in the demonstration, I was just there as part of
my work,” she said.
Hacen Ouali, a political reporter for the daily El Watan, was arrested
along with other journalists on 6 March while trying to cover a
demonstration by members of the “Barakat” (That's enough!) movement.
“We showed them our press cards but they didn't give a damn,” he told RFI.
“They took all of us away and we spent the entire day in a police
station. The police had clearly been told to arrest everyone. It's true
that this is not Ben Ali's Tunisia, but it's very tough working as a
journalist in Algeria.”
Meziane Abane, a journalist with Al-Watan Week-End and an active member of the “Barakat”
movement, was arrested while in his hotel room in Batna, 500 km east of
Algiers, on 17 March. He had been planning to do a report on the
incidents that rocked the region after Bouteflika's campaign manager,
former prime minister Abdelmalek Sellal, mocked someone's Chaoui
(Berber) origins while being recorded by journalists.
The prosecution of Djamel Ghanem, a cartoonist with the daily La Voix de l'Oranie, also caused a stir. He was accused of “insulting the president” in
an unsigned cartoon alluding to Bouteflika's fourth term that was never
published. On 11 March, an Oran court acquitted him of the charge,
which carried a possible 18-month jail sentence and fine of 30,000
dinars (380 dollars). But the prosecutor's office appealed against his
acquittal a week later. Intimidated by the prosecutor's determination
and fearing for his and his family's safety, Ghanem decided to leave
Algeria and seek asylum in France.
The case of Al-Atlas TV, a foreign-owned station that began
operating in March 2013, is illustrative. Its premises were raided three
times in two days last month. First, plainclothes gendarmes with a
search warrant swooped on its headquarters at around 4 p.m. on 11 March.
Then gendarmes with no warrant placed seals on the studios 25 km
outside Algiers rented by Alpha Broadcast, a production company that
supplied Al-Atlas TV with programming.
Accompanied by the state prosecutor, police officers returned to the
TV station's headquarters on the afternoon of the next day, seizing
equipment and placing seals on the computer room. According to the
Algérie Focus news website, the authorities then pressured the Jordanian
TV satellite operator Noorsat to stop carrying the Al-Atlas TV signal.
The signal was removed the next morning (13 March). Al-Atlas TV's CEO
said the authorities targeted the station because of its critical
coverage of the government, and President Bouteflika, in particular. The
station also covered the protests by those opposed to a fourth
Bouteflika term.
Fake pluralism
Many of the law's provisions restrict freedom of information in a
disproportionate manner. They include article 112 on the right of “any
person or entity” to respond to articles “attacking national values and
national interest,” article 123 on “causing offence to foreign heads of
state” and article 119 on “publishing a document that violates the
confidentiality of a judicial investigation.”
Law 11-14 of 2 August 2011 decriminalized defamation of government
officials by amending articles 144 (b) and 146 of the criminal code.
Similarly, Law 12-05 on information abolished prison sentences for media
offences. This should have ended the threat to journalists posed by
articles 144 (b), 146 and 77 to 99 of the criminal code, but the fines
are disproportionate and articles 296 and 298 of the criminal code
maintain prison sentences for defaming individuals.
The state of the media and free speech cannot be gauged by the
number of newspapers. Many of them are published directly by businessmen
with links to the government and intelligence services. According to a report
by the UN special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the
right to freedom of opinion and expression, published on 12 June 2012,
fewer than six newspapers are really independent in Algeria.
While judicial proceedings against journalists or media may be
slowed down or even “forgotten,” the threat of a judicial decision
subsequently emerging constitutes a threat that forces journalists to
censor themselves.
As for broadcasting, a new law
that was adopted on 20 January is supposed to end the state monopoly
that has existed since Algeria obtained independence. But its 113
articles, which aim to regulate and control the broadcast media, will
not take effect until after the presidential election.
If it is implemented, privately-owned TV stations will be allowed to broadcast
from Algeria for the first time. But they will have to be thematic in
nature, and the length of their news programmes will be limited. The
state will continue to have a monopoly of general news TV stations.
Many groups have voiced concern about the lack of independence of the Broadcasting Regulatory Authority
(ARAV) that is to be created. Its nine members will be appointed by
presidential decree and five of them will be chosen by the president
himself. Its powers include the ability to restrict the length of the
news programmes of the privately-owned stations.
The print media, which have been pluralistic in principle since the
1990s, continue to suffer from monopolistic practices, especially as
regards printing and distribution. Most are dependent on
state-controlled printing houses (such as the Société d'Impression
d'Alger) and distribution networks, and the state acts as it sees fit,
deciding arbitrarily which publications will be printed and distributed.
Advertising is also used to pressure the media. Created in December
1967 and operational since April 1968, the National Publishing and
Advertising Agency (ANEP) allocates advertising on behalf of state
agencies and companies. State advertising is a major source of funding
for the print media and strings are always attached to its renewal.
Private sector advertising often comes from companies that support the
ruling political elite and is above all channelled to newspapers that
kowtow to the military and the Intelligence and Security Department
(DRS).