Photo: Gates Foundation. Anti-malarial quality is often unknown to patients and governments.
Source: IRIN
KISUMU, 9 June 2014 (IRIN) - Some
60 percent of countries where malaria is endemic lack solid information
about the quality of available drugs to treat the deadly disease,
according to a new study.
The study,
published in the Malaria Journal in April, looked at 251 reports from
104-malaria endemic countries since 1946. It found that of the 43
countries that had some information about anti-malarial quality, more
than half of these, 25, had only one or two published reports available.
“Estimates of anti-malarial quality vary widely depending on the
sampling methodology used, with most reports not employing rigorous
scientific techniques, potentially biasing results,” said the authors of
the report. “Although there are clear foci of poor quality
anti-malarials, the current global situation remains unclear, poorly
documented; and their impact on public health uncertain.”
This means that when attempting to reduce the number of poor quality and
illicit medicines in the market, individual states are often unable to
quantify the extent of the problem in their country. The report found
that globally, of the nearly 10,000 anti-malarial drugs sampled, 30
percent failed quality tests.
According to the International Medical Products Anti-Counterfeiting
Taskforce (IMPACT), preparations sold as effective antimalarials often
in fact contain substances such as rat poison, mercury, lead, boric
acid, paint, brick dust and floor wax. Such poisons can cause kidney
failure, cancer, developmental defects, strokes, high blood pressure and
other health complications.
According to the Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN),
poor-quality antimalarial containing lower quantities of the required
active ingredient increase the risk of malaria drug resistance,
compounding the problem.
While it has been known for some time that there are a large number of
fake and poor quality drugs on the market, “the efforts put into
addressing the quality have had little tangible impact in comparison to
the size of the problem” say the authors of the study, “because the
programmes have mostly been slow, under-funded and fragmented.”
Challenges with jargon, patenting
Challenges related to terminology and patenting have also hampered progress in reducing poor quality antimalarial medications.
“The controversy over definitions has disabled much that could be done
and the use of the unwieldy term ‘substandard/spurious/falsely
labeled/falsified/counterfeit medical products (SSFFCs)’ has not
helped,” noted the authors of the study, because medicine quality
reports don’t standardize their terminology or use the same metrics for
calculating poor quality drugs.
A member state mechanism on SSFFCs
was established in 2010 to seek global solutions to tackle the
distribution and trade of poor quality and illegal medications, but has
so far made little progress.
“Although drug companies, nongovernmental organizations, and governments
all want reliable access to safe and effective medicines, and deplore
unsafe fake medicines, it is difficult to achieve agreement on action
because discussions too often trespass into conflict-prone areas such as
pharmaceutical pricing or intellectual property,” said
Amir Attaran, professor at the University of Ottawa and one of a group
of health professionals, who came together to advocate for better
action against illicit medications in 2012.
As a result, in places like Kenya, ‘‘unlicensed salesmen have taken
advantage of country’s post-marketing survey that has given room to
smuggling and sale of drugs through porous borders to non-licensed
pharmacy kiosks and clinics operated by non-professionals,’’ said
Charles Maitai of the University of Nairobi’s Department of Pharmacy.
‘‘We advocate for the standardization of terminology about poor-quality
medicines in order to ensure comparability of antimalarial quality
findings,’’ Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN), said in a
statement published online.
Some progress
By lowering the cost of anti-malarial drugs, and distributing
information about the quality of medications, it is possible to reduce
the number of SSFFCs, and lower malaria mortality rates.
In Kenya, anti-malarial drugs are currently being provided freely in
public hospitals, while in pharmacies, they are being sold at a
subsidized price Sh100 (US$1.1) as opposed to the market price of Sh800
(US$9.4).
Following concerted efforts by the government to tackle the disease, the
prevalence has dropped from 34 percent to 20 percent in the last five
years.
To make sure the drugs meet the required standards, the government
conducts periodical quality checks on the drugs stocked in various
institutions. It has been training health professionals on malaria
treatment to ensure that they are giving out the correct dosages to
patients.
‘‘We are advocating health workers to ensure correct use of
anti-malarials to minimise episodes of drug resistance. This will ensure
that the drugs in use remain effective,’’ Kenya's cabinet secretary for
health, James Macharia, told IRIN.
The disease accounts for 30-50 percent of all outpatient visits and 20 percent of all admissions to health facilities.
Custodia Mandlhate, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Kenya
Representative, told IRIN during this year’s World Malaria Day that the
gains so far realized are fragile and there is need to make them
sustainable.
‘‘Should the funding stop, the gains made would be drawn back,’’ she
said. ‘‘There is need for more investment by the government and donor
agencies to properly combat the disease.’’