IFEX
Thailand's military took over the country in a coup d'état last month.
As part of its seizure of the apparatus of government, it has also taken
steps to extend its control over the country's Internet users. The army
immediately "asked for the cooperation" of Thai ISPs to block over 200
new web sites, including independent sites such as Prachatai, and, briefly, Facebook. Global Voices author Aim Sinpeng describes
the situation in Thailand as an "information war," adding that the push
for censorship is driven by the newly-formed National Peace and Order
Maintaining Council's fear that "non-censored information flows could
pose further challenges to the military rule and the state on the
whole." ISPs and government officials in the country are already talking
about re-engineering
the country's infrastructure to create a single government-controlled
gateway to better allow pervasive site censorship and surveillance. The
Thai police have reiterated that even "liking" an online message critical of the junta is a crime.
Offline criticism of growing Internet interference is being silenced
too. Thai advocates for an open Internet and prominent bloggers have
been included in the coup's regular round-ups of academics, journalists,
and politicians. Individuals have been held without charge at army
camps, and threatened with further punishment if they criticize or
challenge the regime. Among the summoned speakers have been Internet law
expert Sawatree Suksri of Thammasat University, who was released
over the weekend, and online activist Sombat Boonngamanong, whom the
authorities claim was tracked down and located by his IP address prior
to his arrest.
The ease with which the military has been able to pressure ISPs to
submit to their controls and intimidate the Thai population has come
from years of escalating online interference imposed by both
military-supported administrations and the recent elected government the
coup effectively deposed. The last military coup Thailand suffered was
in 2006, when the Internet was on the cusp of popular adoption in the
country. While some - mostly pornographic - sites had previously been
blocked by ISPs, the country's undemocratic leaders quickly ramped up
the level of political censorship online. One of the first pieces of
legislation passed in the subsequent, unelected, administration was the
Computer Crime Act, a broad law that create heavy penalties for vague
"cyber-crimes", and placed criminal liability on any intermediary who
allowed unlawful content to be distributed- including comments critical
of the king, or lèse-majesté, a crime frequently used to suppress
political critiques by all sides of Thailand's political spectrum.
The last elected Thai government, led by Yingluck Shinawatra, was little better, increasing funding
for the online policing of lèse-majesté, overseeing officials who
threatened to close down sites critical of Yingluck, criminalizing
Facebook "likes" and social media sharing, and announcing their intention to monitor private communications on Line, a Japanese instant-messaging service popular in Thailand. Many proposals that were mooted during the civilian administration are now being enforced by the same officials under military rule.
Thailand's oscillations between democracy and military rule are bad
for its economy and politics, but they are proving fatal to its Internet
freedoms. Without a period of reform and free criticism, the country
risks escalating its suppression of online speech until it becomes
impossible for democracy and stability to flourish, under martial law or
not.