Source: Human Rights Watch
(Washington, DC) – The World Bank’s internal watchdog should investigate
whether bank projects are contributing to forced labor in Uzbekistan, the Cotton Campaign said today. The Cotton Campaign,
a coalition of human rights, labor, investor, and business
organizations dedicated to ending forced labor in the cotton sector of
Uzbekistan, echoed calls that independent Uzbek groups made in a
November 2014 letter to the Inspection Panel.
The World Bank Inspection Panel will decide by December 19 whether
existing bank projects benefit the forced labor system under which Uzbek
authorities forcibly mobilize more than a million citizens each year to
pick cotton.
“The World Bank has an obligation to ensure that it does not contribute
to forced labor or other human rights violations in its activities,”
said Umida Niyazova, Uzbek German Forum for Human Rights
director. “The Inspection Panel has the crucial role of holding the
bank to account and it can’t do that by giving the bank a free pass for
egregious abuses.”
In response to a complaint from independent Uzbek groups in 2013, the Inspection Panel found
that “as long as Bank financing is supporting in some measure cotton
production and there is a residual possibility that there can be
child/forced labor on farms receiving project support (since they do not
allegedly have a choice of whether to accept child or forced labor),
then it is plausible that the [Rural Enterprise Support] Project can
contribute to perpetuating the harm of child and forced labor.”
However, it delayed by a year making a decision on whether to
investigate to give the World Bank time to establish labor standards
monitoring and address the policies underlying forced labor and child
labor.
Over the last year, though, the World Bank has made little progress
in addressing labor abuses in Uzbekistan. It has not worked with the
Uzbek government to address the root causes of forced labor. The bank
has relied on project-level mitigation measures despite protests from
independent Uzbek groups that such measures would not prevent bank
financing from being linked to the government’s centralized system of
forced labor. The World Bank has expanded its agriculture portfolio, for instance also investing in an irrigation project that will benefit the cotton industry.
“The World Bank’s proposals fall short in Uzbekistan, where forced labor
in the cotton sector is uniquely government-orchestrated and supported
by repressing independent groups,” said Jessica Evans, senior international financial institutions
researcher at Human Rights Watch. “The World Bank needs to ensure that
independent groups and journalists can monitor World Bank projects and
report forced labor without fear of reprisal.”
The Uzbek government’s forced labor system for cotton production is a
gross violation of international law. As activists in Uzbekistan have documented,
the Uzbek government system of coercing farmers to cultivate cotton and
forcing adults and children to harvest the crop continued for the 2014
season. Authorities also suppressed any attempts by citizens to report on these abuses.
Following international pressure, the government reduced the number of
young children sent to harvest cotton in 2014, as it had done in 2013,
but increased the use of older children and adults. The forced labor of
adults disrupts the delivery of essential services nationwide, as
authorities mobilize public sector workers – including doctors, nurses,
and teachers – to fill quotas.
World Bank President Jim Kim has emphasized the importance of the World
Bank learning from its mistakes. After the Inspection Panel identified a
plausible link
between Bank loans and forced labor in Uzbekistan, it is imperative
that it fully investigate what went wrong to prevent similar problems in
the future, the Cotton Campaign said.
“The World Bank should halt these new projects that support the cotton
industry and address the policies underlying forced labor with the Uzbek
government,” said Matthew Fischer-Daly, Cotton Campaign coordinator. “A
thorough investigation by the Inspection Panel would send the right
message to the bank that it must ensure it isn’t contributing to forced
labor now or in the future and say to Tashkent that the bank will not
tolerate such abuses.”